006: La Luna

“And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.”

Genesis 1:16

Few things are more enigmatic than the moon. Throughout history, the luminary has been associated with femininity, superstition, mythology and more recently, the centerpiece of a grand conspiracy. I’m not convinced on werewolves or the moon landings but according to various studies, fertility and menstruation tend to sync up with the lunar cycle. What’s more, the farmer’s almanac suggests that crop yields are more bountiful if seeds are sown during full or new moon phases. Other anomalies such as the Allais Effect only add to the list of bizarre characteristics. In addition, a re-discovery has demonstrated that moonlight is measurably colder than moon shade when using an infrared laser thermometer; something I can personally attest to. Can all of these traits be attributed to a cold, dusty rock, levitating in an empty vacuum? According to Scripture, the moon is a light – not a physical land mass a bunch of Freemasons pretended to land on. If the moon is indeed a “lesser light”, why would world governments and the “scientific” community intentionally misrepresent her properties?

“And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon.”

Revelation 9:11

Apollyon the destroyer

Where else to begin besides the Apollo missions? Regardless of your personal beliefs on the matter, when all the evidence is presented, one has to admit there’s a pretty convincing argument to suggest we didn’t land on the moon. Hypothetically speaking, if we wanted to put the “conspiracies” to rest, why not take it to trial? The defendant, NASA, would be required to furnish proof that they in fact landing on the moon 6 times in less than 4 years on 1960’s technology. Considering this is mankind’s greatest achievement, surely there’s volumes of data, logs, original (unedited) footage and of course, the moon rocks themselves, right? Hopelessly wrong! According to this “final report“, NASA admits they were unable to locate any telemetry data from the 6 moon missions; an estimated 14,000 reels that cataloged everything from speed, pitch, trajectory, fuel usage and much more. In addition, NASA claims they “lost” the original Apollo landing tapes. Can you imagine? The footage we’ve all seen are from the television-formatted recordings during that era. Finally, in 2009 it was discovered that the moon rock given to Holland by Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin was in fact petrified wood! No telemetry data, no original footage, no authentic moon rocks.

“By all accounts, the epic-like search has not ended as anyone had expected. The searchers never found what they set out ot uncover. Aside from a few canisters of Apollo 9 telemetry tapes still stored at the WNRC, the Apollo-era telemetry tapes no longer exist-anywhere.”

The Apollo 11 Telemetry Data Recordings: A Final Report

A good detective, if they’re honest, will set aside their biases and compile all the evidence prior to asking the obvious question(s): How could they keep it a secret? Wouldn’t everyone have to be in on it? For the unwavering patriots who cower or become defensive whenever an uncomfortable topic comes up, the moon landings are akin to walking into a murder scene and finding a battered body, a weapon and blood all over the place, but dismissing the case on grounds that no one could possibly commit such a heinous crime. The image below is Exhibit A: an official high definition photo of the lunar module that allegedly took men to the moon and back. It’s been appropriately dubbed the “meth head tree fort.” When zoomed in, you can see foil, tape, curtain rods and construction paper. Does this look like it can survive the (alleged) -9 Torr vacuum of space with temperatures ranging anywhere from -250 °F to +250 °F? What sort of heating and cooling solution could keep three people alive for nearly 9 days with two batteries that combined for only 592 amps?

A picture says a thousand words. That’s only true if the observer is viewing it with an open and objective mind. For example, NASA claims the descent engine of the lunar module was capable of producing over 10,000 pounds of thrust, yet in every photo from the moon, there is no blast crater beneath the landing site, nor visible dust on the landing pads. This observation lacks a plausible explanation and when considering the alleged 1/6th gravity argument, the proponents stance is exacerbated. In these conditions, wouldn’t dust clouds linger for hours and potentially days? Another glaring issue, one that photographers would notice right away, is the diverging shadows that can be found in multiple photos. On the lunar surface, the only source of light would be the sun, making the image below, impossible.

Upon closer inspection of official moon landing photos, multiple anomalies can be found. In some pictures, the moon buggy shows no tire tracks or foot prints anywhere in the frame, as if it was lowered down on the set with a crane. One image shows a moon rock with a perfectly carved “C” on it whereas subsequent photos have the letter removed. This is significant not only because it’s the same rock, which removes any doubt that the shape of the letter was a coincidence, but that it was intentionally placed there in one frame and edited out in post-production afterwards. On a movie set, props are often labeled with letters and or numbers. The idea that the moon landings were filmed in a studio is bolstered by the impossibly near horizons and duplicated backdrops. Below are official Apollo photographs (numbered for reference) that contain the exact same mountain range, line for line, peak for peak. The only notable difference is the angle at which they were taken. The lunar module is prominently placed in one whereas a rock patch is in view in the other. These images were arguably taken from two different sets but were shot using the same backdrop. What’s more jarring is the fact that both images are from Apollo 15. Whoops!

If the photographic evidence wasn’t bad enough, the video footage is even more undeniable. For instance, the American flag can be seen swaying in the non-existent atmosphere which is simply not possible. Other segments show an astronaut falling to the ground, only to be pulled up by a stage wire that can be seen as it flickers above his suit. One of the more popular clips shows the LEM as it shoots off from the lunar surface, which can be seen here. It begs the question: who filmed it leaving? Never mind that it appears to be hoisted up by a wire. Are we to believe that an engineer from the ground programmed a robotic gimbal so that the module remained perfectly in frame, just to get the “money shot” as they left? Really?

Perhaps the most ostentatious claim is the live television broadcast from the moon, 238,000 miles away, through the (alleged) Van Allen radiation belts (aka the firmament), using 1960’s technology. The amount of power required to send a TV signal this distance is so beyond reality that it pains me to have to explain it. The tallest structure in the United States is the guyed mast, KVLY-TV tower in Blanchard, North Dakota. It stands an impressive 628 meters (2,060 feet) tall which surpasses the One World Trade Tower by over 70 meters (229 feet). It uses 356 kW to power the broadcast signal that covers around 25,000 square kilometers (9,700 miles) or roughly a 90km radius (55 miles). Do you see the problem yet? The height of the antenna required to send a broadcast signal from the moon to the earth would be immense. The signal would also have to travel through the alleged radiation belts and would require an unfathomable power source, given the limited space and carrying capacity of the lunar module. For the earth-based example (reality), 356 kW equates to 356,000 watts. On a typical 12v system, that’s nearly 30,000 amps which far exceeds the 592 amps onboard the LEM. It’s absurd. In case that wasn’t enough, president Richard Nixon spoke to the astronauts using a land line phone from the oval office in 1969. The famous phone call and live broadcast predate broadband internet and cellular technology by decades (plural).

The aforementioned arguments are damning because it’s not hearsay; we’re looking at “their” evidence. Here’s another one. Has anyone ever thought about what sort of havoc moon rocks would cause in a cramped, zero G environment? According to NASA, the moon is a floating space rock with no atmosphere that has been exposed to “space radiation” since inception. The lunar module didn’t have an air lock to put the moon rocks in, which means the astronauts, from every successful moon mission, would have breathed in radiation in the form of dust particles for 3 days on the return home. No ill effects whatsoever. Today, NASA is saying they can’t go beyond low earth orbit (LEO) because of the Van Allen radiation belts. It’s been nearly 50 years since the last lunar mission and the furthest we’ve gone since is a paltry 240 miles (allegedly) or .001% the distance to the moon. But we’re going to mars? You mean this mars?:

Technical Arguments

In science, if a new observation disagrees with a well established theory, the theory must be modified. At least that’s what the scientific community wants us to believe. What if an observation breaks the inverse square law? On February 9th, 1971, Apollo 14 (allegedly) touched down on the lunar surface the day before a full moon. The inverse square law states that light is inversely proportional to the square of the distance. In plainer words, the closer you are to the source, the more intense the energy. A full moon is by far the brightest light in the night sky. Its rays are powerful enough to illuminate nearby clouds and capable of casting shadows on the earth. The inverse square law dictates that the brightness of the moon on its surface would have been magnified to the point of blindness. Apparently the moon wasn’t illuminated until after the final Apollo mission in 1972.

Genesis 1:16:17 states that God created two lights and he set both of them in the firmament. Biblical cosmology describes an enclosed system where the stars, sun and moon are within the earth system. This description suggest that both the sun and moon are much smaller than the earth itself. During a solar eclipse, the shadow cast down on earth is only 70 miles wide. Try making a shadow smaller than the source object for yourself. This is an impossibility here on earth but apparently when we’re talking about “space” these fundamental principles need not apply. This is proof positive that both the sun and moon are smaller than the earth and are more than likely equal in size to each other, just as they appear.

Here’s another argument that takes a stab at the heliocentric model. Below is a visual representation of the motion of the earth and moon as they go around the sun. Because the earth is in motion as well, there will be times when the moon is traveling in the same direction as the trajectory of the earth and other times in the opposite direction. How is it possible that the moon’s transit across the night sky doesn’t speed up and slow down on a regular basis? Think about it. If the earth is traveling the proposed 66,600mph and the moon is “chasing” the earth from behind at 2,300mph, wouldn’t we see a noticeable decrease in speed as it moves across the sky? What about when the moon travels in the opposite direction; shouldn’t it speed up (66,600 + 2,300)? No explanation exists and you’ll never hear this question addressed by any astrophysicist.

The Elephant in the Room

At this juncture, we can address the elephant in the room which is to say, “how could they keep this a secret?” As it pertains to NASA, wouldn’t it be weird if many astronauts past and present, including the very first two on the moon, were confirmed Freemasons? What are Freemasons? It’s a “secret” society. This is what we call a red flag. You don’t have to look very hard or very far to find images of Neil Armstrong wearing a masonic ring with the square and compass logo. Buzz Aldrin on the other hand, still belongs to Clear Lake Lodge No. 1417 in Seabrook, Texas. If the moon landings were faked, what better cast could you ask for?

Leading up to the first moon landings, it would appear that NASA had a tough time keeping astronauts alive. Not one, not two, not three, but a total of 11 astronauts were killed before the first Apollo mission lifted off. One could argue that this profession comes with inherent risks to which I would agree, but not for the same reasons implied. Lying on the world stage is a dangerous operation; there can be no loose ends. Because of this, the individual is a liability if they are told the truth but are unwilling to commit the crime. Would it boggle your mind that the following astronauts died in 6 separate plane crashes and 1 car crash in 1967 alone?

• Ted Freeman
• Clifton Williams
• Charles Basset
• Elliot See
• Russel Rogers
• Michael Adams
• Robert Lawrence
• Edward Givens

Probably the most publicized death during this era was that of Virgil “Gus” Grissom. He too, was a Freemason and was known for his open criticism of the Apollo program. Shortly after hanging a lemon over a NASA logo, he was incinerated during a highly risky and unnecessary test when an oxygen leak caught fire in the command module simulator. Gus, along with Ed White and Roger Chaffee were killed instantly. According to Gus’s wife, Betty Grissom, their house was raided by government agents before the incident was made public. Files, personal papers and diaries were taken and never returned. She remained an open skeptic of the events leading to Virgil’s death and even filed a wrongful death lawsuit that was settled for $350,000 (roughly $2.2 million in today’s money).

Although many astronauts are sworn to secrecy through their fraternal organizations, they were more than likely coerced into this abhorrent deception via blackmail, death threats, torture or worse. Few people would commit treason of this magnitutde against their countrymen under their own volition. I may be wrong about this but body language speaks volumes. Turns out, God didn’t design us to be very good liars. Take a look at the press conference after they just completed the greatest feat in human history. We landed on the moon!

“We leave you much that is undone. There are great ideas undiscovered, breakthroughs available to those that can remove one of truth’s protective layers.”

Neil Armstrong

Conspiracy

Most people go into zombie mode when they hear this word. After all, they’ve been trained to do as such. For me personally, I welcome the title as well as the ridicule. The definition simply means a secret plan by a group of people to do something unlawful or harmful. Back in the 1700’s, settlers conspired to leave Britain after parliament refused to give settlers representatives in the government. What did they do? The colonies secretly plotted against the British government and left for America to start their own country. America was founded on conspiracy, or at least that’s the story we’re told. We shouldn’t run from this word, we should embrace it as free thinking Americans. All this post intends to get across is that a satanically inspired group of secret society members, cabbalists, Jews and Zionists conspired to fool the world for money and control. NASA raked in $25.4 billion for the moon missions alone (roughly $152 billion after inflation) and all they had to do was give the public just enough proof that they pulled it off. The fruit of their labor has been the enslavement of minds across the “globe” and an annual budget that equates to over $58 million per day. This fraud couldn’t have been perpetrated without the help of the media, actor-nauts that could keep a secret and coercion with other governments. In addition, it’s safe to say there’s a satanic element to this deception, of which the Freemasons are highly implicated, but there’s still one missing piece to the puzzle: a movie producer.

Stanley kubrick

Stanley Kubrick is often regarded as one of the most gifted filmmakers in cinematic history. Of all the films he produced and or directed, three of them are of particular interest. The first one is “2001: A Space Odyssey.” This film was released in 1968, just one year before the first moon landing. Could it be, that all six moon landings were shot on this set under the guise that it was for his upcoming space flick? That may seem like a stretch to some but there’s several important connections between Kubrick, NASA and the moon landings. The most obvious is the picture below where Kubrick can be seen walking alongside a NASA administrator, advisor and astronaut. This picture says it all, really. If the moon is not at all what NASA claims and is in fact a light in the sky like the Bible says it is, wouldn’t a science fiction buff such as Arthur C. Clarke be a necessity to write the script?

“For the stars of heaven and the constellations thereof shall not give their light: the sun shall be in his going forth, and the moon shall not cause her light to shine.”

Isaiah 13:10

Fast forward to the year 1980. The cult classic, “The Shining” is released to the public. In a famous segment of this movie, Kubrick seemingly confesses to filming the moon landings. The little boy, Danny, is playing with some toys on the floor wearing an Apollo 11 sweater. He’s in a crouched position before he stands up and wanders down to room 237. With the rocket prominently front and center screen, his standing simulates the liftoff of Apollo 11 and room 237 is a reference to the alleged distance to the moon at that point in time (237,000 miles).

While that might not seem like much, Kubrick’s last film, “Eyes Wide Shut”, brings everything together. This was his last film and for good reason. Conspiracy theorists will claim that he was threatened to never release the movie because it exposes the occult. If you’ve never seen this movie or it’s been some time since your last viewing, I encourage you to watch it again. Kubrick died of a heart attack just hours after delivering the final copy to the studio with no prior health concerns up to that point. He was just 70 years old. The fascinating part about this is that not only is the occult exposed, which the Freemasons were highly implicated throughout, but the film released on July 16th, 1999 which marked the 30 year anniversary of the lunar module touching down for the first time. Let that sink in for a moment. He was seen with high level NASA employees and a science fiction writer in 1965. He filmed a space movie just 1 year prior to the moon landings which would have provided perfect cover to conceal suspicious activity from the public. He shot a full blown mini version of the moon landings in “The Shining” and then dying mere hours of a heart attack after submitting his final copy of a movie that sheds light on the occult, who was behind the moon landings, which released on the 30 year anniversary of the Apollo 11 landing. Yikes.

conclusion

The real conspiracy is that of the fallen angels and their plot against God, the Father. There’s a very strategic reason they faked the moon landings. This event was the first time in human history that we had an instrument of flight capable of seeing the earth in its entirety. According to scripture, nothing makes it past the firmament. However, in the captured minds of the world, they still accomplished what they set out do. The missions to the moon were more about showing people the globular earth for the first time, temporarily ending the flat earth vs heliocentric debate. This is an important note, one that will be expounded on in the proceeding post.

Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.

Exodus 20:4

According to Freemasonry, it is Lucifer the light bearer who is god of this world. Sun worship and the occult are as old as time and with the Apollo missions, the sun was incontestably placed in the center instead of God’s creation. The Bible makes a clear distinction between the sun and the moon and even gives them masculine and feminine titles. The Freemasons, being a fraternal organization, conquered the feminine by planting their flag (seed) on the lunar surface. In doing so, Satan had accomplished his desires through the flesh of man and by the only means he knows how: a lie. Apollyon, from the bottomless pit, has manifested in the physical realm through the Apollo missions, where mankind pierced the firmament and rose above the most high (metaphorically):

“For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.”

Isaiah 14:13-14

The first attempt to pierce the firmament and wage war with the Most High is told in the story of Babel (Genesis 11:1-9). The premise makes no sense using the globe model but when we incorporate the enclosed cosmology of the Bible and the dome, referred to as the firmament, it all makes much more sense. The physical war was lost when God destroyed the tower and confounded the languages. With the “success” of the Apollo missions, the spiritual war was won, or at least for a season. It’s interesting to note that as we approach end-times, a new language app called “Babbel” seeks to bring the world back together once more. There is wickedness in high places and those in control know the truth. There’s still a final chapter yet to unfold. Without understanding this pivotal piece of the puzzle, humanity will remain hopelessly lost and ill-equipped for what comes next.